Search for: "S.B. V. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 8:23 am by Walter Olson
With the passage of S.B. 15 in 2005, the Texas Legislature took a leading role in the national effort to end the abusive aspects of asbestos and silica litigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:33 am by Sean Wajert
  The report then offers a description of asbestos and silica litigation in Texas’s two multidistrict litigation courts handling asbestos and silica cases, and the impact of reform legislation (S.B. 15) on the state MDLs. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
The first, S.B. 1447, states: SENATE BILL NO. 1447 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Finance on February 2, 2011) (Patron Prior to Substitute–Senator Wampler) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 10 of Chapter 3 of Title 58.1 a section numbered 58.1-423, relating to tax revenues generated by commercial spaceflight; Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:37 am by On the Net
Here is the text of Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s October 13, 2010, press release about the brief she filed on behalf of Arizona in the United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:38 am by David G. Badertscher
R41352Subjects: Business; LaborCRS Reports, 111th Congress (9/17/2010; Posted: 10/5/2010)---------------------------------State Efforts to Deter Unauthorized Aliens: Legal Analysis of Arizona's S.B. 1070 Report No. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 (1975), that when a federal court is making a prediction of state law under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Challenge to Arizona Immigration Law S.B. 1070 [By: Gwynne Monahan |In: Immigration Law, Personal Rights]16. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]