Search for: "SOS Global Express, Inc." Results 521 - 540 of 860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:30 am
[*Energy/Nuclear]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm by Schachtman
Pfizer, Inc., 185 Misc. 2d 600, 607, 713 N.Y.S.2d 898 (Sup. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The communication buys in wholeheartedly to the idea that expression can and should be policed by algorithms. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
Carter also stated in the letter that he had discussed moving funds from the chamber's building funds with Bentley and the chamber's accountant before he did so. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Globalization of the legal world has led more lawyers to travel overseas, so grasping another country's customs can make or break a lawyer's deal. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(here); Turbo Global Partners (here); Nielsen/Arrayit Corporation (here). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:44 am by Jerry Brito
I’ll skip the practical feasibility of banning software short of also banning “generative” PCs, much less doing so globally, and stick to addressing the legal questions. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Complaints about allegedly defamatory publications should first go through a complaints procedure set up by internet service providers, perhaps as part of the Global Network Initiative. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:34 pm
   We have previously expressed the opinion that the Berry Amendment, and the specialty metals restriction in particular, is "a relic of a former age, ill-suited to the realities of our global marketplace and current procurement demands. [read post]