Search for: "STANFORD v. STANFORD"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm
(My count may vary from other publicly available tallies; the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, for example, has a slightly higher count because it has included some suits in its tally that were filed as individual actions, not as class actions.) [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 6:21 am
v=44nfbyjzkMg Please consider supporting ChinaTalk at https://glow.fm/chinatalk/. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
An Exploratory Analysis of Choice Screens Applied in the European Microsoft Antitrust Case Omar Vásquez Duque Stanford University, School of Law, Students; Stanford University, Department of Economics, Students Abstract In March 2010 Microsoft started displaying a... [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
The CAFC applied the two-step framework under Alice v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:37 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
(This Q&A was first published by Stanford University on March 3, 2021.) [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 8:24 am
Stanford professor Susan Athey discusses the importance of "middleware" with en mphasis on "an independent Multi-Platform App Store" (this post continues below the document):376-2 Susan Athey Opening O... by Florian MuellerProfessor Athey describes today's "market for mobile smartphone operating system platforms [as] a duopoly, with market leaders Apple and Android together accounting for almost 100% of mobile smartphone revenue share outside of China. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 6:30 am
Por el licenciado Roberto L. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
CA) and Monsanto v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:15 pm
The CAFC applied the two-step framework under Alice v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:36 am
” In Grutter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm
Only one patent damages verdict in U.S. history was larger; it was about a pharmaceutical patent and, as Professor Mark Lemley (Stanford) notes on Twitter, was "erased on appeal. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:59 pm
The Stanford Band play (not technically a Hail Mary, but the same idea)? [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
According to a study performed by Stanford Law School and cited by the Delaware Supreme Court, 45 percent of Securities Act cases filed in state court in 2019 had a parallel action filed in federal court asserting the same claims. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
Following BMG v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
