Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C."
Results 521 - 540
of 27,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2012, 5:33 pm
An interesting question arose in Mukatoff v Board of Review with regard to non-immigrant workers. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
The First Amendment also does not bar states from enacting laws that punish expressive activity when substantial privacy interests are being invaded in an essentially intolerable manner. 4. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Civil Code Section 711 states that “[c]onditions restraining alienation, when repugnant to the interest created, are void. [read post]
25 May 2007, 5:27 am
C. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
L. c. 266, § 30. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:52 pm
Tort filings fell by 25 percent in those states studied by the National Center for State Courts. 3. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:59 pm
Interesting stuff! [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
Indeed, the Court’s control over public policy measures derogating from EU rights generally holds Member States accountable to carry out an ‘assessment of where lies the fair balance between the legitimate interests in issue” (Orfanopoulos and Oliveri judgment, C-482/02 and C-493/01, para. 96). [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
It will be interesting to observe whether more opinions will be published as a result. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:48 am
Section 28 states: The designation of a public broadcaster as an eligible news business is subject to any other conditions specified in regulations made by the Governor in Council. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
I imagine Sky TV will be breathing a partial sigh of relief - as over on the IPKat Eleonora has a very interesting update from the CJEU in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment headlined with CJEU says that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive but Member States can protect them and where the court has decided that "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 12:11 pm
§57D-5-03(c). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
C. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:21 am
Partner C then conveyed its interest in the East Olympic property to B. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm
DC rendered a decision on June 30, 1989, stating that there is no question that defendant, [Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:03 pm
Cal) C-02-4891 and C02-5292, the plaintiffs unsuccessfully challenged the structured settlement policy of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:32 am
State ex rel. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:23 am
Public interest can be demonstrated if: the results of the research are available to the public on a nondiscriminatory basis; or the research is performed for the federal government or a state agency. [read post]
