Search for: "STATE v PEOPLES"
Results 521 - 540
of 50,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:12 am
LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:30 am
Gerald D. or Troxel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In FDA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:55 pm
Trump In The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
For both, focusing on the actual people who practice, argue about, interpret, and implement international law is essential to explaining how international law works. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective juror's neighborhood.(5)… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:20 am
Despite the hullabaloo surrounding the trial, the focus should be on the defendants, the charge and the verdict in HKSAR v Ng Gordon Ching Hang & Ors [2024] HKCFI 1468. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The Supreme Court’s big Second Amendment case this term was United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
During the session, I joked that Trump v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
The Supreme Court of South Carolina abandoned the contributory negligence rule in the 1991 case of Nelson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:20 am
They commonly felt it a privilege, or even a responsibility, to speak up against the violence they have witnessed against the Palestinian people. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent decision, Chambers v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
" Cutter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
That may be accurate for people who were alive when those laws were still on the books, but how do such past laws influence young people who were born decades after Loving v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
” Yet, the report only recommends that the Israeli government comply “fully and immediately” with the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) orders in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
The ICJ hears suits brought by one nation state against another nation state. [read post]
