Search for: "School District No. 23 v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11"
Results 521 - 540
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
The Rise and Possible Fall of Investor-State Arbitration in Asia: A Skeptic’s View of Australia’s ‘Gillard Government Trade Policy Statement’ Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/32Luke R. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 23 Conference. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Cir. 2006); 11 James Wm. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
Walton v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
By way of background, I have studied and written about federal sentencing for more than fifteen years, including time spent as a federal judicial clerk, a litigator in private practice, and a faculty member at Marquette Law School, where I teach Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Sentencing, and related courses. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Judge Ward affirms $482,000,000 damages award, but overturns willfulness finding: Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
Here’s a quick summary: Three citizens had submitted a bunch of requests to the school district in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years: Warren had filed 34, Regis had filed 11, and Rejon had filed 23. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Court of Appeals of California, Third District, Sacramento. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
Groves, Sr.Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 1998 WL 812318, at *23 (M.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Dowd litigated Bakalar v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Hence Illinois unquestionably had jurisdiction over [petitioner]'s petition.[22] Furthermore, the court can still rule on grounds for dissolution of marriage even if the petitioner has not satisfied the 90-day residency requirement.[23] In Hermann v Hermann, 219 Ill [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
In a second significant action, the Court sent back to a federal appeals court an Indian tribal rights case that had been granted and was scheduled to be heard on Feb. 23 — Madison County, N.Y., et al., v. [read post]
