Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases" Results 521 - 540 of 1,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Sotomayor pointed out that the instructions given to the jury allowed it to “convict Perez based on what he ‘stated’ alone. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
South Carolina by refusing to instruct the jury that the only alternative to the death penalty is life without parole; and (3) whether Lynch’s due process right to a fair trial was violated by allowing a prosecutor with a history of misconduct to make a number of improper comments at trial. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
  She sought an order prohibiting the Red Cross from introducing evidence that it provided proper aftercare, as well as an instruction allowing the jury to infer negligence by the Red Cross due to its spoliation of evidence. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Where, as here, the juvenile court applies the incorrect legal standard, we may decline to engage in substantial evidence review and instead remand to allow the juvenile court to apply the correct legal standard. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm by Schachtman
” As noted above, the preponderance standard is not universally applied in civil cases, and certainly not in criminal cases. [read post]
” However, it is important to note that the only U.S. published court case interpreting the Tokyo Convention applied an objective negligence standard of reasonableness instead of the more deferential and subjective “arbitrary and capricious standard” that governs claims for domestic flights under U.S. federal regulations. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Jury Instr., Civil, No. 14.72.2 (2008) ("You must now determine whether you should award punitive damages against defendant[s] . . . for the sake of example and by way of punishment"); N. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
State Farm", and who remarked that:"[I]t's pretty clear that Campbell will remain the jurisprudential standard for this case. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The case also presents an unrelated question regarding what a defendant must do to object to an erroneous jury instruction. ------- Title: Weyhrauch v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  In contrast, architects and engineers must meet a higher professional standard of care (see Civil Jury Instruction 600). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case, she argued, “turns on the Mount Clemens standard. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The Two Cases Taken Together What can we say about these cases when we look at them in tandem? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  The prejudicial effect was easy to glean:  the judge gave a “curative” instruction that the evidence wasn’t admissible to show defendant’s guilt, but only to prove absence of mistake, and when the befuddled jury asked whether it could take the evidence of the two prior occasions into consideration, the court gave the Delphic reply, “Yes, but only as specified in the ‘other acts’ instruction. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Mississippi in light of evolving standards of decency, equal protection, and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment when the advisory panel at the penalty phase of trial was repeatedly instructed in violation of Caldwell. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:21 pm
The only appellate court decisions directly addressing the issue in the United States have held that a trial court must instruct a jury on this "extreme caution" standard of care rather than the "ordinary care" standard under state law. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:38 am
" These rules complement an older, standard instruction that jurors shouldn't discuss the case with others or read or listen to news reports about the case. [read post]