Search for: "State v. Barnett" Results 521 - 540 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 8:37 am by Randy Barnett
Ok, if you look at the Heller case—and I'm talking about the DC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm by Randy Barnett
Ok, if you look at the Heller case—and I'm talking about the DC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
  Thomas Barnett has stated that "the antitrust laws are enforced to protect consumers by protecting competition, and not competitors. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
One of the glaring things revealed by a review of the briefs in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:43 am by Amy Howe
  There is a series of posts at The Volokh Conspiracy discussing the case:  Eugene Volokh has some “small observations” about the lawsuit; Jonathan Adler suggests that the suit “makes Oklahoma and Nebraska look like fair-weather federalists”; Randy Barnett contends that the lawsuit “seriously misreads the Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm by Melissa Barnett
By Melissa Barnett The Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in the highly anticipated dispute between Pom Wonderful and Coca-Cola. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
Forsythe, Clarke D., Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 8:29 am
Imposition of the death penalty is unlikely to resume until next year, after the justices hear the Kentucky case of Baze v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
” Meanwhile, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett applauds the response to the President’s comments by the president of the American Bar Association. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
The Los Angeles Times reports on the introduction by Senator Jim Webb of a new bill, the Military Service Integrity Act, in response to the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]