Search for: "State v. F. L. J." Results 521 - 540 of 2,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Major J stated in Sagaz at para 34: “[i]f the employer does not control the activities of the worker, the policy justifications underlying vicarious liability will not be satisfied. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States, 398 U.S. 333, 354 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am by Sean Cornely
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Int'l Ass'n of Bridge Iron Workers, Local 229, 974 F.3d 1106, 1117 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc); see also Texas v. [read post]