Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 521 - 540 of 9,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Those licenses, and the marriages that ensued, were the product of a ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Goodridge v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The First Amendment Coalition responds that Apple and Samsung have failed to establish that these docu- ments contain trade secrets because, for the reasons stated by the district court, the parties have not shown that they will suffer competitive harm from public disclo- sure. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court stated that punishing the mother would have, at best, a "very limited" deterrent effect. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am by Linda McClain
” On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s rulings in Romer and in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:37 pm by Wells Bennett
  As one district court judge concluded at the time, in Boudin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm by Thomas Key
Supreme Court about state sovereign immunity in copyright, Allen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
” The court then explains that the first order, having caused a great deal of uncertainty, sparked suits from the states of Washington and Minnesota, resulting in a preliminary injunction from a Washington district court on February 3, 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
This Term the Court rendered three First Amendment rulings: Reed v. [read post]
” Supreme Court Opinion In April of 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment, ruling that an approved JD was “final agency action” subject to judicial review. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On September 9, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied review and decertified the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s previously published opinion in Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
First, the court agreed with Brenda that the Petition failed to state a claim under rule 12(b)(6) for modification of custody. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Sixth Judicial District Court, the appellate court hearing the case determined that the lower court should have dismissed the plaintiff’s case because she failed to comply with the requirements of a medical malpractice case. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Sixth Judicial District Court, the appellate court hearing the case determined that the lower court should have dismissed the plaintiff’s case because she failed to comply with the requirements of a medical malpractice case. [read post]