Search for: "State v. Freeze" Results 521 - 540 of 1,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm by Amy Howe
The headliner in the October calendar is the litigation over Trump’s March 6 executive order, which put a freeze on both new visas for travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries (Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen) and the admission of refugees into the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports on Monday’s decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by EEM
Travel ban news & commentary (in chronological order):Neither Facially Legitimate Nor Bona Fide–Why the Very Text of the Travel Ban Shows It’s Unconstitutional (Just Security, 9 June 2017) [text]"Trump Loses Travel Ban Ruling in Appeals Court," New York Times, 12 June 2017 [text]Challengers File Briefs in Supreme Court on Travel Ban, while 9th Circuit Leaves Freeze on Ban in Place (SCOTUSblog, 12 June 2017) [text]Ninth Circuit (Mostly) Upholds the Preliminary… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm by Donna Sokol
The recent ruling in O’Connor v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Second, as to the Section 1104-a claim, Justice Ash held that, as a matter of law, Dorine’s Separation Agreement and General Release “for which she was paid a severance package” barred her freeze-out oppression claim based on alleged exclusion from participation in management. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Second, as to the Section 1104-a claim, Justice Ash held that, as a matter of law, Dorine’s Separation Agreement and General Release “for which she was paid a severance package” barred her freeze-out oppression claim based on alleged exclusion from participation in management. [read post]