Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 521 - 540 of 904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 2:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co., 119F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:50 pm
If you want to help Duncan in this exciting adventure, email him here with news of the litigation in your jurisdiction.Right: chocks away, as Duncan "Biggles" Bucknell" flies off around the world to service his clientele's international interestsOther scorecards on Duncan's website list the current state of play in the US v Czech Budweiser dispute (here), Ranbaxy's battle with Pfizer over Lipitor (here) and the Eli Lilly/Teva/Dr Reddy's… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 744 F.2d 213, 216 (1st Cir. 1984), more appropriate. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:50 am by Adam Santucci
Could the Court have been influenced by Congress' enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, reversing the Court's 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
The court agreed stating: While the Supreme Court has characterized infringement as defined in the Hatch-Waxman Act as "highly artificial," see Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]