Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 1:27 pm
The First Circuit decided Bartlett v. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:00 pm
Haas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Overall, the conclusion about credibility always rests with the decision-maker following a survey of all the evidence. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:00 am
AG Ontario, 2018 ONSC 2586 [14] The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[a]ll law and law‑makers that touch the people must conform to [the Charter]. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:10 am
I cover this in my book, Food Regulation: Law, Science, Policy, and Practice, in discussion of the case, United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:44 pm
Justice Edelmann, in West Vancouver (District), v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:45 am
Wells v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets that condemns the… [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
That was the fate of Degelmann et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am
EU policy makers should study Mr Justice Richard Meade's Nokia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:05 am
It is worth making explicit the parallels between the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the first in New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
”) State ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
The case is Staub v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
For this reason, the statute was under-inclusive, causing concern that the State was disfavoring a particular type of speaker (video game makers). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
The Court appoints itself – instead of Congress or the expert agency – the decision-maker on climate policy. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
” Notably, in Authors Guild v. [read post]
