Search for: "State v. Shelters" Results 521 - 540 of 1,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
It was argued, citing the cases of ZH v Tanzania [2011] UKSC 4 and Birmingham CC v Clue (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party) (2) and Shelter (Intervener) (3)[2010] EWCA Civ, that C’s decision that it was reasonable for A and his family to take up occupation in accommodation in Ghana necessarily represented an unlawful interference with A’s and K’s rights to private and family life, since it was a necessary implication… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
It was argued, citing the cases of ZH v Tanzania [2011] UKSC 4 and Birmingham CC v Clue (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party) (2) and Shelter (Intervener) (3)[2010] EWCA Civ, that C’s decision that it was reasonable for A and his family to take up occupation in accommodation in Ghana necessarily represented an unlawful interference with A’s and K’s rights to private and family life, since it was a necessary implication… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Some people equate this figure with the “poverty line” although Statistics Canada expressly states that this is not a measure of poverty. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:16 pm
The Court stated: "[W]e conclude a defendant asserting primary caregiver status must prove at a minimum that he or she (1) consistently provided caregiving, (2) independent of any assistance in taking medical marijuana, (3) at or before the time he or she assumed responsibility for assisting with medical marijuana. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]