Search for: "State v. Straw" Results 521 - 540 of 630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm by Andrew J. Batog
”[7] Indeed it is true that the extension of universal jurisdiction to piracy, according to Professor Dunoff, “had little to do with human dignity at all; rather, states sought to punish pirates as individuals because they were not (by definition) the agents of any states. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Schachtman
” In 2010, Justice Scalia, who was a law-review-producing law professor for the University of Virginia for several years, responded to a lawyer’s oral argument, in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:23 am by SHG
Posner’s argument — that there are “countless” exceptions to the First Amendment and it’s perfectly natural to make more — is exactly the government’s we-should-have-power-to-censor argument that the Supreme Court flatly rejected in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 3:17 pm by Kevin
"[V]ague platitudes about a facility's 'crucial role in the national defense' are not enough to convict a defendant of sabotage. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm by Jim Walker
These governmental filings state that the items included “plastic straws, plastic knives, rubber bands, plastic corn on the cob holders, broken plastic cups, paper clips, aluminum bottle caps, aluminum foil wrappers,” and other items. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court also suggested that the court request an attorney to represent the pro se plaintiff in the proceedings (Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Wagner
But as an idea it is surely valid, as it works on precisely the federalist, greater than the sum of its parts logic which informs many of the successful modern states and institutions, including the USA, the UN and the EU. [read post]