Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 521 - 540 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2017, 9:15 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:15 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
Justice John Paul Stevens dissented from the high court majority's rejection of the application for a stay of execution -- and Justice Clarence Thomas offered a spirited response. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:17 am by Scott Bomboy
The CRS cites several cases where the production of business records was at issue, and Flynn’s attorneys named a more-recent Supreme Court decision in their letter to Senate investigators, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:06 am
"Hope Does Not Need Rose-tinted Glasses | By Steven FerryHospitality Net - USA"We all agree that if guests are criminal towards us directly, we have every ... [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
The remainder of the interpretive dispute between Justice Scalia and Justice Stevens is about the semantic content of the operative clause itself. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Heather Gerken
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]