Search for: "U.S. v. Richardson*" Results 521 - 540 of 598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Thirty-one states prevent people on parole or probation from casting ballots.Four states permanently bar ex-inmates from voting and do not allow restoration of that right, while eight others disenfranchise only people who have committed particularly egregious kinds of crimes.Sunday’s court decision striking down new barriers erected to limit the number of Florida’s previously disenfranchised population from voting is admirable, but much more needs to be done to ensure that those who… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Rob Robinson
for Federal Acquisition/Procurement - http://tinyurl.com/3st7ok3 (U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
NORTH TEXAS HEALTHCARE COMPLIANCE PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION Invites Members and Guests to Our Next Group Luncheon Employee Benefit Security Administration Insights On Healthcare Organization’s Health & Other Employee Benefit Plan Rights & Responsibilities Under Employee Retirement Income Security Act Featuring Kristi Gotcher U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm by Erik Gerding
Legislatures can’t entrench laws against amendments by future legislatures (although the government must honor contractual obligations – for a discussion of these issues, see U.S. v. [read post]