Search for: "U.S. v. Waters (john)" Results 521 - 540 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am by Randy Barnett
This individualist conception of popular sovereignty was articulated by Chief Justice John Jay and Justice James Wilson in the Supreme Court’s first great constitutional case of Chishom v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Both cases ask whether a determination by the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
John Bellinger also discussed Power Wars. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Senate Armed Service Committee Chairman John McCain called for more information about the FON patrol in an open letter to Secretary Carter. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
FBI agents interviewed one of the men soon after Awlaki was killed in a U.S. drone strike in 2011, but he denied any connection with Awlaki. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
Two days later, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the Philippines v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The incident is one of a series of accidents in the waters surrounding the country. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm by Jason Shinn
I read a very informative article from the American Conservative titled “The Deciders” by John Hay. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
-Kurdish raid in Iraq that left one U.S. commando dead. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am by Elina Saxena
In the latest Water Wars, Zack Bluestone noted that U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:27 am by Zack Bluestone
Water Wars readers will have noticed that two widely-anticipated events—U.S. freedom of navigation (FON) patrols in the Spratlys and the Arbitral Panel’s jurisdictional ruling in the Philippines v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm by Zack Bluestone
CNO John Richardson responded by clarifying that FON patrols are “part of routine navigation in international waters, consistent with international rules there: I don’t see how these could be interpreted as provocative in any way. [read post]