Search for: "US v. Martinez" Results 521 - 540 of 1,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently issued a decision on this subject in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
Blanco got out of the car and went into her house to use the bathroom. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Martinez, First Circuit: Appellant pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 70 months' imprisonment. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
Martinez, 221 Ariz. 383, ¶ 14, 212 P.3d 75, 79 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2009) quoting U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:20 am by Evan M. Levow
Please contact us today online or at (877) 975-3399 to schedule a free and confidential consultation with our legal team. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
    Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 1:34 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 94693 (ED NY, July 10, 2014), a New York federal district court permitted plaintiff, a Rastafarian, to move ahead with his claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when his turban was removed at a police precinct after he was arrested.In Martinez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Martinez, 690 F.3d 1083 (U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
It is the scientific use of the imagination. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
  Pending resolution of Elonis, the Court appears to be holding the case’s twice-relisted doppelganger, Martinez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
AND E.C., AND ROSA SILVIA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 13-0158 You might remember FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. [read post]