Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
Work experience was useful, but more useful if it was teaching and less useful if it was in the military, and 4-9 years of work is most ideal. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am
Not for use on goldfish. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
—3/29/19 Another Round of Strange Bedfellows on Severability in Texas v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
Grasshopper House, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
—3/29/19 Another Round of Strange Bedfellows on Severability in Texas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:58 pm
Pipelines are typically buried using various construction techniques, such as trenching and tunneling. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
So the First Circuit's use of this doctrine seemed quite strange to me. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
P. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:25 am
The court’s opinion in Heritage Resources v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Perhaps this is evidence that, as Lena Salaymeh has persistently reminded us this year, law remains in urgent need of decolonization. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:29 pm
As noted by GenomeWeb in December 2018, the plaintiffs in the 2018 case in the Southern District of New York — Monib Zirvi of Weill Cornell Medicine; Matthew Lubin, now an internist but previously director of medical genetics at Strang Cancer Prevention Center; and Maria Kempe of Lund University, amended their complaint to include patent attorney Robin Silva as a defendant. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Henson v. [read post]
