Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest" Results 521 - 540 of 2,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
Section 37 states “the High Court may by order (whether interlocutory or final) grant an injunction or appoint a receiver in all cases in which it appears to the court to be just and convenient to do so. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
In that capacity the state has an interest independent of and behind the titles of its citizens, and all the earth and air within its domain”], and municipalities (see, e.g., City of Olmsted Falls v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I am certainly interested in the broad area of voting rights and have accepted every invitation to any symposium that has invited me to participate and to write something relevant to the topic. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Shortly thereafter, the Bankruptcy Court discharged Espinosa's student loan interest.[2] In 2000, the United States Department of Education commenced efforts to collect the unpaid interest on Espinosa's student loans.[3] In response, Espinosa filed a motion in 2003 asking the Bankruptcy Court to enforce its 1997 discharge order by directing the Department and United to cease all efforts to collect the unpaid interest on his… [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That would be fitting, because if this fine book is ultimately about one thing, it surely would be debate itself—the deep and fundamental debate that roiled the early United States and transformed it into a new kind of constitutional republic. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
She then sued under the Illinois Religious Freedom Act (the Illinois version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act) and the Illinois Right of Conscience Act; the court explained the Right of Conscience Act in some detail: On the same day the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Since it was possession of property, not ownership, which gave title to sue for possession, the claimant’s right to possession of his passport was sufficient to give him title to sue for conversion and his letters to the secretary of state in May 2010 amounted to an unconditional demand for the return of the passport, with or without a visa. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm by Mark Ashton
Ed. 666, 676-77 (1872); see also Note, The Establishment Clause and Religion in Child Custody Disputes, 82 Mich.L.Rev. 1702, 1716 n. 49 (1984) (collecting other United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]