Search for: "United States v. Jordan" Results 521 - 540 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Honorable Vernon Sykes and Honorable Roger Corbin (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the League of Women Voters of the United States (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, and Ohio (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the NAACP, Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior, and Mary Jordan (in support of the… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am by Daniel
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Daniel
These substances are categorized from most severe (schedule I) to least severe (schedule V).Illegal possession of a prescribed drug.Other illegal drugs. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
United States: Whether to overrule the “separate sovereign” exception to the double jeopardy clause; Nieves v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
Jordan Discart, who was the first to sue, became the class representative. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Interdependent Third Branch, Jordan Singer looks at a recent survey of “more than 1000 likely voters, concerning their knowledge of and attitudes about the United States Supreme Court,” concluding that although survey “respondents reported very high interest in the Court generally,” “actual familiarity with the Court and its members is middling at best,” and “only 38% of respondents thought that recent decisions… [read post]