Search for: "United States v. Lynch" Results 521 - 540 of 850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Her Facebook page on the book is here.OUP explains: Much of the struggle for racial justice in the United States has taken place in the courts, from the Civil Rights Cases of 1883 to Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Hargraves and Title IX   Book Session: Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain and Canada, by Drew Halfmann  Ziad Munson -- DiscussantZakiya Luna -- DiscussantDrew Halfmann -- Creator, Organizer, AuthorIsaac Martin -- Chair, DiscussantDrew Halfmann  -- Author Southern Law  Tamara Myers -- Network Rep, Creator, OrganizerBarry Godfrey -- Chair, DiscussantMegan Francis, The Strange Fruit of the… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees alleged that after BofA completed its acquisition of defendant Merrill Lynch and combined its retail brokerage unit with Merrill’s brokerage operations, BofA kept the Merrill Lynch unit as a wholly owned subsidiary and swept its “legacy” FAs, who had worked for BofA’s brokerage unit, into the Merrill Lynch subsidiary. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 672 F.3d 482, 491-92 (7th Cir.2012), distinguishing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm by Howard Friedman
This post focuses on the Court's invalidation of Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.]In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]