Search for: "V D"
Results 521 - 540
of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 8:30 am
Professional Responsibility Reinstatement Where attorney Charles Glynn has refrained from alcohol for ten years, and held positions of trust during his suspension, reinstate is appropriate. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
Jenson and another v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423; [2011] WLR (D) 133 “A contractor who carried out works to a dwelling owed a duty under section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972 to see that the work was done in a workmanlike or professional manner. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:31 am
R (Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council (Shlomo Dowen and The Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service for England, interested parties) [2010] WLR (D) 273 “The right of ‘persons interested’ under section 15(1) of the Audit Commission Act 1998 to inspect the accounts to be audited and all books, deeds, contracts, bills, vouchers and receipts relating to them did not stretch, on the facts, to examination of… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Here are the updated materials in State of Idaho v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Supp. 3d 665, 704–705 (D. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:43 am
Per Tate v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
., Huck v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:09 am
Child Support Agency v Truman; [2009] WLR (D) 40 “The test for the correct comparator in cases of disability-related discrimination in the employment field under s 3A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, was the same as that applied to the housing provisions of the Act by the House of Lords in Lewisham London Borough Council [...] [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:32 am
Justin D. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:58 am
In Government Class Actions After Jennings v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:07 am
Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKHL 5; [2009] WLR (D) 26 “Demonstrators who had been confined within a police cordon for several hours did not suffer a violation of their right to liberty guaranteed by art 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as scheduled to [...] [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:35 am
Burns v HM Advocate [2008] UKPC 63; [2008] WLR (D) 392 “Where a defendant, who was resident in Scotland, was interviewed in England by police officers who told him that there was sufficient evidence on which to charge him with offences relating to child pornography and that they would recommend such a course, the reasonable time [...] [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
Commune de Sausheim v Azelvandre (Case C-552/07); [2009] WLR (D) 64 “The national authorities could not rely on the protection of public order or other interests in order to oppose the disclosure of information on the location of the release of GMOs into the environment. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Essex Trading Standards v Singh; [2009] WLR (D) 81 “In order to acquit a defendant of a charge of unauthorised use of registered trade marks in relation to goods, contrary to s 92(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, under the statutory defence provided by s 92(5) of the Act, it was not enough for the [...] [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:23 am
Law Society v McPhail [2011] WLR (D) 45 “In the interests of fairness, a person charged with contempt of court whose liberty was therefore at stake should be able to appear at a hearing to answer points raised by his accusers. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:55 pm
This editorial about the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:23 am
Ratcliffe v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWCA Civ 39; [2009] WLR (D) 33 “A woman who had been the partner of a naval officer for over 25 years at the time of his death from disease said to derive from exposure to asbestos during his employment was in an analogous situation to that of [...] [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:12 am
COUNTY VILLAGE, LLC d/b/a HAPPY ENDINGS CASINO, Respondent and Appellant. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:35 am
Finch and another v Richardson [2008] EWHC 3067 (QB); [2008] WLR (D) 389 “For the purposes of provisions in the Representation of the People Act 1983 in relation to illegal practices and to errors or false statements in declarations, ignorance of the law could constitute ‘inadvertence’ so as to provide an excuse for such errors and [...] [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:53 am
Posted by D. [read post]
