Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner" Results 521 - 540 of 1,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am by INFORRM
Then, on the damages/costs figure for Massey v UK: Massey personally got just over half of the figure they quoted. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
A mortgage holder has the right to redeem (take back) real property that is the subject of a real estate tax foreclosure when the owner does not pay taxes on the land, according to the recent decision of the Ohio Supreme Court in In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
Wagner v City of Garfield Heights, Ohio, 2014 WL 4067171 (6th Cir. 8/19/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Signs [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
On 5 August 2014, judgment was handed down in Hong Kong in the case of Yeung v Google ([2014] HKCFI 1404). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives UAS: UAS Operators v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On July 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Quebec (Commission des normes du travail) v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:37 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Eric Berkman has a fine article out in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, in which he quotes me on the First Circuit’s decision in Merriman v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:06 pm
The reason that the court’s decision in Wagner v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:25 am
Leung; Trying to see the wood despite the trees: a plain approach to legal translation, Víctor González-Ruiz; Minimal unit of legal translation vs. minimal unit of thought, Svetlana V. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]