Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Windsor, 133 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on June 27, 2014, the DOL proposed the revision in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:03 am
Windsor, 133 S. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:26 am
So it will only be a matter of time before SCOTUS grants certeriorari in a post United States -v- Windsor case to more fully develop the constitutional civil rights jurisprudence of same-sex marriages.For now, however, it is nearly a full-time job just keeping up with the caseload; it seems every month brings a new decision and a new twist to the analysis.www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:57 pm
Last June, in the decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
So far, no state’s prohibition on same-sex marriage has been upheld in any court in the year since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act last year in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
This will be the first case reaching the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of such state bans since the Justices in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
The CFPB noted that this guidance was issued in response to the decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (DOL) June 27, 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would amend the definition of spouse under the current Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) regulations in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
The change to the FMLA policy would come after United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
The title of this post comes from this recent paper by Professor Nancy Knauer, the abstract of which states: When the 2013 landmark decision in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am
But Perry did not bring the promised nationwide victory, and it pales next to the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am
The proposed changes are intended to reflect (and expand upon) last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:40 am
Brown in the Boston Business Journal Breaking News – Carlton Cabot Charged With Fraud Clotfelter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
As co-blogger Will Baude points out, today the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit became the first federal appellate court to strike down a state law banning same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
