Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 521 - 540
of 747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Woods v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
Wood v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Nuclear tests and conscientious objectors Last week there were news of two very interesting cases. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
The Eighth Circuit's case of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, 2009 WL 2382415, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:09 pm
The interesting point is that in granting the third trial the appellate court relied on two cases, one of them being United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Class 99) Component designs – General Court rules on informed user of a motor: Cases T 10/08 and T 11/08 Kwang Yang v OHIM – Honda (Class 99) Two stripes, three stripes and OUT: General Court decision in Case T-479/08 adidas v OHIM – Patrick Holding (Class 46) B&O speaker shape has appeal, so loses appeal: General Court decision in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 99) General Court upholds… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Two petitions – Holder v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:24 am
Wood v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
United States likely did with the legislative repeal of DADT. [read post]
