Search for: "In Re: Does v."
Results 5381 - 5400
of 30,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
This precedential holding makes clear that a transaction lacking transfer of title, authorization to re-sell, and involving stockpiling does not constitute a commercial sale for purposes of §102(b)/ §102(a)(1). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am
The biggest problem with the authors' analysis is that it does not mention Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:18 am
Natural Res. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:44 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:47 am
In the case of In re Hionas, ___ B.R. ___, 2006 WL 3913760 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.) [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:02 am
The federal judge coordinating the cases of some 200 Guantanamo Bay detainees challenging their long-term confinement gave hints on Wednesday that he may re-shape somewhat how those cases are to be handled by more than a dozen other federal judges. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:16 am
The difference is that my response does not undermine my policy commitments or give ammunition to the other side. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Lafler v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:26 am
In an opinion issued earlier this week, Simms v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm
Unless the foreign judgment is capable of recognition in New Zealand, the only way for the intending parents to become the child’s legal parents in New Zealand is to apply for adoption (see, eg, Re Cobain [2015] NZFC 4072, Re Clifford [2016] NZFC 1666, Re Henwood [2015] NZFC 1541, Re Reynard [2014] NZFC 7652, Re Kennedy [2014] NZFLR 367, Re W [2019] NZFC 2482, Re C [2019] NZFC 1629). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:49 am
Vaughan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
Prods., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
But does the absence of bidders mean that many foreclosed properties have no value? [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 11:17 am
LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Chochorowski, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:25 am
I’m not enough of a Court-watcher to know whether the Court would, if it grants cert, do the sensible thing and overrule (or at least narrow into non-existence) the Calder doctrine – the prospect of the Court hearing the case and re-affirming (or even, heaven forbid, strengthening) the doctrine does, I admit, make me a little nervous (though maybe someone who knows the predilections of our Justices better than I do can reassure me on that score). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
The Court’s order today does not set the case for re-argument; all it does is extend the Court’s time to act beyond the 180-day limit on motions for rehearing that I have written about in the past. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
The bad news is that they're still children, which is what makes the decision in Brown (having replaced Schwarzenegger) v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
There is one thing that everyone agrees on, though: the Ninth Circuit’s holding squarely conflicts with the 2022 Seventh Circuit ruling in Seafarers v. [read post]
