Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 13,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2015, 9:48 am
Panel V. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:39 am
The decision in in the 'Jersey Boys' case which has been covered by this blog here and here: Corbello v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
As for the claimed off-label promotion, “[p]rescribing physicians had varied exposure to [defendant’s] marketing. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
In Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:36 pm
The decision was entered in Hafer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
See Binderup v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:01 pm
.; (iii) follow prescribed labeling requirements. 21 CFR 801; 809.10; (iv) follow current good manufacturing practices (cGMP). 21 CFR 820; and (v) participate in the medical device reporting system. 21 CFR 803. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
" (M.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
”Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Whitener, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
Astiana v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
Aktiebolaget Karlstads Mekaniska Werkstad v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:15 pm
The first case is State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
–CDM v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The Federal Court decision in Red Label Vacations Inc v 411 Travel Buys Limited 2015 FC 19 has focussed on a detailed considerations by a Canadian court of the issues of copyright and trademark infringement via the use of metatags. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
Hood. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
The dissent in Plumley v. [read post]
