Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5381 - 5400 of 21,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2019, 6:55 am by Thomas Long
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:41 pm by Daniel S. Blynn
” And, he went on to remark that: [T]hat just pales in comparison to the medley of courts that have chosen to ignore the DC Circuit [in ACA Int’l] and instead follow the 9th Circuit’s extremely misguided and breathtakingly expansive definition of ATDS [in Marks v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:46 am by Michael Rushford
  Laurie McGinley and Mark Berman of the Washington Post report that the former head of the FDA wanted to maintain control over state access to execution drugs, but the story misses the fact that in Cook v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Paul Horwitz, University of Alabama School of Law, has posted A Close Reading of Barnette, in Honor of Vincent Blasi, which appears in the FIU Law Review 13 (2019): 689-728:This article, written for a symposium marking the 75th anniversary of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am by Benjamin Beaton
This marks a return to Title IX for the court, which last year held in a closely watched decision that a right to cross-examination applies in university disciplinary hearings. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am by Richard M. Re
And Hyatt ignored the strong stare decisis requirements that marked Casey. [read post]