Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 5381 - 5400 of 6,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Steve Hall
Yesterday, Ed Brayton commented in "How Many Innocent People Are In Prison? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
¶7 Nguyen’s petition for review was granted solely on the included offense issue. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am by David Bernstein
  Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, a counterclaim is filed by a defendant in a civil suit “against the plaintiff or against the plaintiff and other people. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  But then last year came Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:06 am by Julie Lam
On remand from the Michigan Supreme Court, on February 2, 2010, the Court of Appeals published a per curiam opinion in People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Many people think that the computer program exclusion means that there should be no patent protection available for computer programs at all. [read post]