Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 5381 - 5400 of 6,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
I opposed retroactivity for the new SOCs in my written testimony and reiterated the main points in my oral testimony today. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 3:44 am by familoo
I sort of miss them…(I know, some of you are muttering about how you have had enough of the President’s views (with a small v) to last you a lifetime…). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm by Oliver Heinisch
Justice Birss in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case ([2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)), namely that there should be no discrimination between implementers that are “similarly situated” and suggests a case-by-case, or sector-by-sector approach. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:21 am by Joy Waltemath
” In the first step, the guidance calls for employers to use a “targeted” screen of criminal records, which considers “at least the nature of the crime, the time elapsed, and the nature of the job — the three factors identified in Green v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:48 am by Alden Abbott
It is also amazing to observe the downplaying of consumer welfare by agency heads, given that, since 1979 (in Reiter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am by Jeff Margulies (US)
The defendants have reiterated their position that the court can and should rule on this defense. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:36 pm
However, such clauses are enforceable to the extent they "relate to ideas and concepts which were based upon secrets or confidential information of the employer…" Armorlite Lens Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion in which he agreed with the decision not to hear McKee’s case, but he urged the justices to reconsider the seminal First Amendment cases at the heart of the dispute, including New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:43 pm by Joy Waltemath
Further, following an additional two-month gap in communications, the employer repeated its final offer, reiterated its belief that further bargaining would be futile and stated its intention to implement the final offer. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor had her employer proven that it did not know or have reason to know she was working overtime hours, said the appeals court, adopting the reasonable diligence standard and finding the employer’s constructive knowledge to be a question of fact for a jury (Craig v. [read post]