Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 5381 - 5400 of 12,939
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am by Michael Grossman
Third: Three states (CA, MS, WV) do not a totalitarian regime make. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
  As stated by Kitchin LJ in Medimmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1234:"Whether a route has a reasonable or fair prospect of success will depend upon all the circumstances including an ability rationally to predict a successful outcome, how long the project may take, the extent to which the field is unexplored, the complexity or otherwise of any necessary experiments, whether such experiments can be performed by routine means and… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Each author is well regarded in their field, and I think each of their assessments is worthy of serious consideration. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:53 am by SHG
That was January, 1996, and the decision was United State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
 Judge Kara Stoll agreed explaining that at certain points in her career she had to make decisions about what path she wanted to pursue - litigation v prosecution, district v appellate work - and that required active decision making. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am by familoo
Not with his bootlylicious bottom, but with his judgment in the case of Lancashire County Council v M & Ors [2016] EWFC 9 (04 February 2016), just published. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Justice Ian Binnie stated the following in Free World Trust v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
Even though Holmes made many bad decisions (including Buck v. [read post]