Search for: "State v Richards" Results 5381 - 5400 of 9,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Under the terms of the Amendment, each state has a single vote, which is determined by how a majority of that state’s Representatives vote. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Third Circuit decision addresses free speech and termination for just cause issuesRita Miller v Clinton County [Pennsylvania], USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket # 07-2105In this case, the Circuit Court of Appeals sets out the guidelines followed by courts in resolving claims by public officers and employees that their employer has violated their First Amendment right to free speech and the impact of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement on judicial control over the hiring, discharge and… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by Aaron Jordan
Last week, the Supreme Court heard Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:03 am by gstasiewicz
…” [emphasis in original] A July 12, 2011, email from NLRB Regional Director Richard Ahearn to NLRB hearing officer Peter Finch, responding to an article in The Hill newspaper about a request from Rep. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
  Artists have legitimate reasons to use existing images beyond just to parody them or comment directly upon them and Cariou v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
• What are potential approaches for physicians, including those practicing in states where it is legal, those who receive a request for access when the practice is legal in nearby states but not in the state of practice, and those who practice in a state where it is legal but are personally opposed to physician-assisted death. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 17 February 2022, Richard Spearman QC handed down judgement in Hills v Tabe [2022] EWHC 316 (QB) in favour of the Claimant. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am by David Laufman
And the Justice Department obtained another FARA conviction in May, in the case of United States v. [read post]