Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 9,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Murphy found that two express exceptions to preemption (which could be called “savings clauses”) potentially applied: “First, disclosure may be made through the judicial process. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
Also a case about state regulators and antitrust.Wednesday's calendar has a civil case about appellate courts reviewing district court factual findings. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The student will consider how political communities rank laws—from constitution to statute, judicial decision and regulation. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
The district court and Eleventh Circuit agreed with Grunkle Sam. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
United States 13-1309Issue: Whether, when the district court disposes of a motion for a new trial while an appeal is pending in the court of appeals, a defendant must file a second notice of appeal in order for the court of appeals to have jurisdiction to consider the issue that was before the district court in the motion for a new trial. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
” *John Nieman suggests that the Court’s single-sentence denial of the states’ petitions may be the perfect book-end to its single-sentence denial of the first same-sex marriage claim in 1972: “With forty years of hindsight, the Court’s one-liner saying effectively nothing in Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
When a wave of lawsuits challenged FedEx’s independent contractor model (with cases filed in 40 states), the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the cases for multidistrict litigation proceedings in a federal district court in Indiana. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
In addition, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
In affirming the trial court’s judgment denying the petitions, the First District Court of Appeal – in addressing what it termed “an issue of first impression in California” — followed uniform Federal law in holding the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA; 49 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:41 am
It first caution C.M. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, to determine whether the judicial records are subject to the public’s right of access: the first prong asks whether there is a history of access to the proceeding; the second prong turns on whether public access “plays a significant positive role in the functioning of the particular process in question. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am
The Florida Bar — constitutionality under the First Amendment of a state ethical rule barring candidates for state judicial posts to personally solicit campaign funds Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma concurred with the initial panel decision of the U.S. [read post]
