Search for: "State v. Keis"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 22,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:00 am
—Dallas 2016, pet. denied)(friend liable for driver’s negligent driving where the driver had taken the friend’s keys without her knowledge); Williams v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
Two key terms are central to interpreting the statue’s definition of machinegun: “automatically” and “single function of the trigger. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am
Sometimes those drafts never get introduced at all; other times, the draft bills are revised in key ways before introduction. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:15 am
The Court created the state-of-mind problem in Begay v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
Called “Stat Packs” the analysis is broken out into 23 separate and distinct categories summarizing key statistical trends of the Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
Keister v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:07 am
For more information on the Eagle v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
Underpinning the decision in this case are two key cases, N v Home Secretary [2005] UKHL 31 and D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 423. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am
” At AntitrustConnect Blog, Steven Cernak looks at the “immediate aftermath” of the Court’s decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Even while extolling the singular importance of adhering to precedent, the chief justice rejects a key part of that ruling. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Nineteenth century commerce was inextricably connected with sea-going transportation and the key arena for that commerce—ports—were “crucial sites at which local, state, federal, and international authority converged and collided. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm
The opinion strikes me as in pretty direct tension with cases like ACLU v. [read post]
