Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 6,571
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 1:42 am
Madison Square Garden (U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
The answer to that question, some may argue, is found in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employees
19 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employeesMatter of New York State United Teachers v Brighter Choice Charter School, 2010 NY Slip Op 08383, Decided on November 18, 2010, Court of AppealsThe New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) filed a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request with six Charter Schools* seeking, among other things, payroll records showing the full names, titles, corresponding salaries, and home… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:03 am
Washington Square Financial, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:28 pm
Her judgment states:2. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:41 am
” Peviani v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
Haskell County Board of Comm’rs (10th Cir. 2009) (citizen had standing because “whenever he visits the courthouse square for [various] purpose[s], he cannot avoid the [Ten Commandments] Monument”); American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
BIAW providing education on new state energy code Sweeping changes to the Washington State Energy Code are on their way. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
The right to access a communal garden in a London square, may, for instance, go with the right to a tenancy of a flat around the edge of the square. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
The right to access a communal garden in a London square, may, for instance, go with the right to a tenancy of a flat around the edge of the square. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:40 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
” In 1980, the United States Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
See Sanford v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
Earlier this week, the Washington Court of Appeals applied this analysis in Dunlap v. [read post]
