Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5401 - 5420 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Robert Harper
As courts has explained, “[t]he burden of proof is on the party seeking such determination” (Matter of Mayer, File No. 2019-2355, Decision, dated June 8, 2021 [Sur Ct, Suffolk County]). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
Just as T’s payments to the rent account wouldn’t extinguish T’s liability for rent for that period (and hence HB entitlement) neither would a payment to the rent account by anyone else, including L. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm by HR Hero Alerts
Brad Williams, a contributor to Colorado Employment Law Letter, has extensive experience counseling employers in labor and employment matters and defending employers in employment-related litigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am by Dan Bressler
Because Brown’s conduct at issue in this matter falls outside our interpretation of Rules 1.15 (I) (c) and 1.15 (II) (b), we conclude that Brown’s conduct did not violate those Rules. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
"[R]emoval is a virtual certainty for an alien found to have an aggravated felony conviction, no matter how long he has previously resided here," the opinion says. [read post]
” She further states that “[t]his action is an important step toward clarifying [Regulation B] and ensuring that traditionally economically disadvantaged groups and communities have equitable access to credit. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm by Giles Peaker
He hadn’t done anything, or caused it to be done. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In other cases of garden-variety hearsay, A is the "witness," and admissibility of B's statement is a matter for state hearsay rules, not the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:48 am by Dan Bressler
Because Brown’s conduct at issue in this matter falls outside our interpretation of Rules 1.15 (I) (c) and 1.15 (II) (b), we conclude that Brown’s conduct did not violate those Rules. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2018) ¶9:324.1 citing R&B Auto Center, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
A & B); Teleflex’s Brief in Opposition; KSR Reply Brief (314 KB); Teleflex Supplement. [read post]