Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 5401 - 5420 of 10,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
But I swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States and I witnessed the NSA violati [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
 Last I looked, the Sixth Circuit, for example, was saying that all its sister circuits had rejected it, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that the EEOC, in its complaint, specifically described the defendant “an instrumentality of the state of Pennsylvania,” the court pointed out that in ratifying the Constitution, the states consented to suits brought by other states or by the federal government; thus, for this reason, suits by the United States against a state are not barred by the Constitution. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Florian Mueller
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm by rainey Reitman
At the same time, the United States recognizes that collecting information in bulk may not result in the collection of information about persons whose activities are not of interest to the Intelligence Community. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
United States was the case, the opportunity, for the Supreme Court of the United States to change this. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Jane Chong
Today the government filed a short response to the detainees’ petition for an en banc rehearing in Hatim v. [read post]