Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5401 - 5420 of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas decisions, at least twenty-one state advocacy organizations formed.Some achieved legislative victories, convincing state lawmakers to repeal sodomy prohibitions.Meanwhile, advocates urged state courts to use state constitutional law to provide protections for lesbians and gay men.Of the eleven states that decriminalized sodomy after Bowers, eight did so through the courts.Not only did state court activism result in on-the-ground victories,… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Class V stock was a publicly traded “tracking stock” that tracked the performance of VMware, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by Visae Patentes
Kappos and the Anti-State-Street-Majority";Spicy IP: "Bilski: A Few Thoughts More... [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  For example, if State A is home to one percent of all U.S. citizens, the tax must collect one percent of all revenues from State A. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
[Given the current state of the law, is it really necessary to ask this question? [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Lawrence Lessig ‘on the economics’: curse of the copyright holders (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright Decisions District Court Massachusetts: Not much hope left – copyright claim time-barred, claim for unjust enrichment pre-empted: Jürek Zamoyski v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
The state court held that it was bound by a 2011 California Intermediate Appellate Court decision in the case of Luther v. [read post]