Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 5401 - 5420 of 44,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am by Richard M. Esenberg
Still, I think that the opposition to Citizens United does reflect a basic philosophical disagreement about the law of political participation. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
Moreover, the United States explains, the Sixth Circuit's decision does not conflict with the decision of any other court of appeals. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
On September 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 9:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent infringement ice to THE UNITED STATES, 2017 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
In this case one of the Administrative Patent Judges hearing the case at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was APJ Matt Clemens, who previously represented Apple as a defense attorney in patent infringement matters prior to joining the board... [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:10 pm by Mark kende
Legal scholar Ilya Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy has authored an interesting and lengthy post critiquing parts of the article. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/10/20/does-justice-thomas-endorse-the-supreme-courts-notorious-decision-inkorematsu-v-united-states/ Respectfully, I think Ilya is wrong. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm by Gene Quinn
The undeniable truth, however, is that since the Supreme Court issued its decision in eBay v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, (1st Cir., Jan. 15, 2013), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals remanded with instructions to dismiss as moot a suit brought in 2009 alleging that the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm by Eileen McDermott
” The reply comes three days after the United States Solicitor General recommended that SCOTUS grant cert in Athena or "another such case", rather than in Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]