Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 11,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Merpel thinks this is a strange slogan and assumes that it sounds better or more meaningful in whichever language it was originally conceived before it was translated into English. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:24 am
Labor Commission and Quast v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 2:15 am
The patent related to a phonetic symbol system using English letters, as opposed to the symbols traditionally used by linguists. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
In Turcios v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm
United States and Victoria's Secret Direct v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:23 am
" In a lot of ways the case is similar to one discussed on this very blog on an earlier note; Svensson v Retriever. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
The case in question was Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, decided in the Court of Appeal in the early days of 2015, which dealt with the sale of a simple article of clothing; a t-shirt. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
Apple judgment says.The consolation prize that is the Epic Games v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am
The problem for plaintiff in Castagna v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:05 am
Perez v Fernandez: Australia's First Decision on the Moral Right of Integrity" (2013) 23 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 174UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-32JANI MCCUTCHEON, University of Western Australia - Faculty of LawEmail: jani.mccutcheon@uwa.edu.auThis article examines the recent Federal Magistrates Court decision of Perez v Fernandez, Australia’s first case on the moral right of integrity. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
The Australian court is concerned because it's currently holding an extensive Samsung v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 pm
For those countries that have not adopted service marks, marks of political parties are filed in classes 9 and 16 for the usual reasons.Getting back to UKIP, the illustrations above are those of successful lions (Lonsdale v Puhin Deng* and ING v Daniel Cekal) who have protected their market share or hunting grounds, so to speak, based in similarity. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:12 am
For the full complaint in Kidane v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:01 am
In Hicks v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:08 am
Some background first: In Matal v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:21 am
But as his recent opinions in Alleyne v. [read post]
