Search for: "Mark May"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 63,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 5:16 am
Anyone may interpret the graph as he or she sees fit - I just find it, well, interesting. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:39 am
For a full discussion of the application of the "immoral or scandalous" bar of Section 2(a), see Anne Gilson LaLonde and Jerome Gilson, "Trademarks Laid Bare: Marks That May Be Scandalous Or Immoral," 101 Trademark Reporter 1476 (September-October 2011). [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
We may be in April now, but here’s what you missed from the IPKat back in March. [read post]
21 May 2013, 2:13 am
In re Zico Beverage LLC, Serial No. 85284093 (May 9, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Since ‘relatedness’ may be exhibited by complimentary products, it should also not be considered all-or-nothing, but evaluated on a sliding scale. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:21 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 11, 2021 - 10 AM: In re Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V., Serial No. 87408465 [Refusal to register the purported mark ARTESANO for "pre-packaged sliced bread," on the ground of genericness or, alternatively, mere descriptiveness (and lack of acquired distinctiveness]. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:07 am
It observed that in some contexts, "Cali" may bring to mind a California life style, but here Cali is followed by the word burger. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
Allegedly, one may predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal, nine times out of ten, by simply looking at the marks and the identified goods or services. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 2:54 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark BEARPLAY for "magazine publishing; publication of entertainment magazines for gay men" on the ground that the specimens of use submitted by applicant failed to show use of the mark with the recited services. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Brock asserts that he has controlled the style and quality of the band's music, that he is therefore the owner of the mark HAWKWIND, and that the mark is famous and is entitled to a broad scope of protection. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
It was irrelevant that the contested trade mark may have been developed based on the word ‘hyundai’ because the public would still have to engage in a highly imaginative cognitive process in order to decipher the sign.PatentsRose Hughes reported on the first substantive decision of the UPC Court of Appeal, which reversed the preliminary injunction in 10x Genomics v NanoString. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:56 am
The Court may have jumped to conclusions here. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:37 am
Reading one of his favourite IP weblogs, Mark Anderson's IP Draughts, this Kat was both intrigued and startled by one of the items on Mark's recent post "Ten things I have learned recently [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 1:06 am
A special hat tip to Jordan Eth and Mark R.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
[Appeal briefs and other papers may be found via PACER; Oral argument recordings may be found here].Ex parte appeals:In re Vibrynt, Inc., Appeal No. 13-1019 (Serial No. 77701760) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark PREVAIL for "medical devices, namely, abdominal implants and delivery systems therefor," in view of the registered mark PEEK PREVAIL for "surgical implants comprising artificial material]. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:53 am
Narita's declarations established a first use date of May 27, 2016. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:52 am
" Of course, the fact that applicant may be the first and only user does not immunize the mark from being merely descriptive of the services.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: So on its face the mark may seem incongruous, but when you drill down to the actual services, maybe not.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
"The Board found the mark to be at most suggestive of the goods. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 2:02 am
Conversely, if the adoption by the Indian company is not genuine, it may be considered dishonest, resulting in an injunction against the Indian company. [read post]
