Search for: "Kai Schmidt-Hern"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2018, 8:32 am
As far as I know (but please correct me if I am mistaken), a platform like YouTube has never been found primarily liable for the infringement of copyright or a related right by a German court, although in 2015 a court in Berlin held that Google was primarily liable for using product pictures on Google Shopping (GRUR-RR 2016, 265) [many thanks and Katpat to Kai Schmidt-Hern for the info]. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 2:20 am
Kai Schmidt-Hern and Benjamin KochThis post is the sequel to the post ‘Trademarks in Transactions – Part I: Due Diligence’ which dealt with trademark issues which regularly arise during the due diligence phase of an M&A transaction. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:56 am
Kai Schmidt-Hern This case is about the genuine use of shape marks. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
” 3) Celebrity Names in Class 16 by Kai Schmidt-Hern “With decision of 25th February 2019, the German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) has ruled on the registrability of a celebrity name for inter alia publications in class 16. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
” 3) Celebrity Names in Class 16 by Kai Schmidt-Hern “With decision of 25th February 2019, the German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) has ruled on the registrability of a celebrity name for inter alia publications in class 16. [read post]
