Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
and Stearns (Denis Stearns, On (Cr)edibility: Why Food In the United States May Never Be Safe, 21 Stanford Law & Policy Review 245, 2010.) [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
An empirical study of climate change litigation in the United States. 40 Envtl. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:34 pm
On December 13, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Costco v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Yet, this case is not really a “David v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
If that was the political calculation, then the circumstances surrounding it became much more complicated with the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Greens v United Kingdom at the end of last month. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
” The dissent was filed in Allen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 4:44 pm
On further consideration of the petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition, and Respondents’ show cause response, we conclude that ordering a factfinding hearing pursuant to United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
Righthaven v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:19 pm
And also this week, David Boies and Ted Olson did a phenomenal job of in the Ninth Circuit panel’s hearing on the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm
The Court heard oral arguments this week in another “David and Goliath” kind of case, Thompson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting First Derivative. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:05 pm
Twenty years ago, United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
Gore (2000) and Citizens United v. [read post]
