Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 7,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
United States, 347 U.S. 645, 652-53, 74 S.Ct. 826, 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954)).... [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:09 pm
’” Campbell v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The latest contribution to the Second Circuit’s reversal docket is a 400-page sentencing opinion from earlier this week, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
” Lluch v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
§§ 1257, 1291, 1292, or any other provision of law, neither any federal appeals court nor the Supreme Court of the United States shall have jurisdiction, either by appeal or as an original action, over any case in which reimbursement is sought for expenses allegedly incurred in conformity with rules established by a SIMAB. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on May 19, 1937. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
However, the United States is not a party to that treaty. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on August 30, 1939. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:05 pm
The majority of the “Rakofksy 74” defendants are scattered across the United States and Canada. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am
Bodden, 68 AD3d 871, 875; see Matter of Dox v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:41 am
The United States Supreme Court has held that “[t]he prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children constitutes a government objective of surpassing importance” and “the use of children as subjects of pornographic materials is harmful to the physiological, emotional, and mental health of the child. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As he well knows, such terms have very precise meaning under US law, and by that metric - one that's extremely favorable for American companies, by the way - only a small minority of Chinese imports into the United States are "unfairly traded. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
Willful non-support or willful abandonment of a minor or other dependent person when the life of that minor or that dependent person is or is likely to be injured or endangered. 9. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
