Search for: "York v York" Results 5421 - 5440 of 51,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Michael Geist
It states:Copyright law does not exist solely for the benefit of authors: York University v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such an argument, made by Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg, didn't carry the day as to public official libel lawsuits in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The authors of this guest post are: Doug Greene, BakerHostetler, Leader, Securities and Governance Litigation Team; Genevieve York-Erwin, BakerHostetler, Partner; Mike Tomasulo, Baldwin Risk Partners, Managing Partner, Management Liability National Practice Leader: Emily Baxter,  BakerHostetler, Associate; and Alex Karambelas, BakerHostetler, Associate. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:18 am by Eric Segall
This term's decisions on guns and abortion reinforce this thesis.Writing for the majority in New York Pistol and Rifle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
They have also argued that Dominion has made no credible allegations that these defendants knew they were uttering false statements or acted with reckless disregard as to possible falsity, as required by the “actual malice” standard of New York Times v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm by Jeff R. Vaisa
District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437 [2011]; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934, 938… [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:38 pm by Peter Mahler
Her detailed and closely reasoned 132-page opinion in Ashkenazy v Gindi addresses motions to dismiss a bevy of claims and counterclaims in a battle royal between two prominent real estate investors with high-priced lawyers involving co-ownership interests in properties located in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Montreal, and other locations. [read post]
Bruen’The Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in NYSRPA v. [read post]