Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:46 am
So let’s move to the next category of state-significant natural communities. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:26 pm
That is the lesson of the state-by-state brokered buy-in for original Medicaid. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Once you buy a copy of something, you own that copy. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Once you buy a copy of something, you own that copy. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Once you buy a copy of something, you own that copy. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Once you buy a copy of something, you own that copy. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Once you buy a copy of something, you own that copy. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm
At close of business on Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
The Court of Appeals did not buy his argument. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
[Buy one here.] [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
Hall v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am
LaSalle Hotel Operating P’ship, L.P., 380 F.3d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 2004). (...)Precedent guides that if BB&B’s advertising state- ment is literally false, it may be actionable “without reference to the advertisement’s impact on the buying public. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:08 am
The case involves the doctrine of First Sale in the United States, which underlies library lending and also allows consumers to buy and sell used books, DVDs, etc. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:22 pm
The Fourth District’s recently-published decision in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
· In Wax v. [read post]
