Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The law codified the ‘ABC Test’[1] which had been applied by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles ((2018) 4 Cal.5th 903). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Wu, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, University of Colorado Law School, ACLU of Northern California and Yeshiva University – Benjamin N. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 8:24 am
" … California law directs the Department to review food labelling for compliance with federal law. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm
Capra v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm
Capra v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
From Hamilton v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
One such recent California federal district court case, Pez Seafood DTLA, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
Trade secrets misappropriation claims brought by InteliClear, LLC, under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA) against ETC Global Holdings have been reinstated by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 1:59 pm
In Gay Law Students Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
II, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
Smith, 2020 ONSC 2782, R v Roberts, 2020 ABPC 99, Rodrique Levesque et al v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 2:58 pm
See Moser v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
But its federal lawsuit was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Northern District of Texas (i.e., Dallas), and in September it was dismissed. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
Cal. 2020), and based on those filings, has been declared a vexatious litigant in at least the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, see Strojnik v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
This was underscored recently in a California disability employment lawsuit, Thurston v. [read post]
