Search for: "DOES ONE THROUGH ONE HUNDRED"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2014, 8:09 pm
In the face of this Central American influx, the United States does not have to wait for new WTO rules – it can unilaterally address the issue through a rational approach to immigration, which also takes into account the reality of labor and economic migration – persons who want to temporarily migrate just to work. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is of little controversy to say that these commissions on wrongful convictions, through their recommendations and observations, have had a considerable impact in this area of law, on the criminal justice system at large, and have likely prevented further wrongful convictions from recurring in certain types of crimes. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
These problems have now become topics of considerable debate and interest in legal academia and practise, and exemplified through formal commissions and ministerial review [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:52 am
Most importantly, what does that mean for the future as hundreds more American soldiers head to Iraqi to once again to try to advise and train? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
I wonder if they're going to make it one hundred. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
In determining the preemptive scope of the FAAAA, one must recognize that "everything is related to everything else," and the FAAAA does not go so far as to preempt state laws that affect prices, routes, or services in “only a tenuous, remote, or peripheral manner, such as state laws forbidding gambling. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
The IRS was tasked with the job of sorting through those applications and more or less separating them into three piles: yes, no and maybe. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
A law that is accessible, but that does not have foreseeable effects, will not be adequate. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:15 pm
We’ve combed through each page, paragraph, and sentence. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Any percentage cutoff (other than the unrealistic cutoff of zero or one hundred percent) will be arbitrary. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
However, if there is an option/choice to receive cash or an other benefit, this may result in taxable wages, even if the employee does not elect to receive the cash [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:53 am
One can hardly justify a law with “funny math” that inflates benefits and completely ignores costs. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
(See, for example, this post from PrawfsBlawg, and this one and this one from Conglomerate, this one and this one from ProfessorBainbridge, and, of course, a vast number of message board comments [including some on the foregoing posts]). [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:27 am
"... and write about each one. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 1:41 am
Nor does he dwell on the irony that all of the firms that required huge influxes of taxpayer money were particularly expert in avoiding taxes themselves, largely through the use of off-shore tax havens. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm
The building uses less than 60 percent of the energy that a typical U.S. office of the same size does. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm
The building uses less than 60 percent of the energy that a typical U.S. office of the same size does. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 8:53 am
Li Jun’s case is one of them. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:15 am
But cell phones can store millions of pages of text, thousands of pictures, or hundreds of videos. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
One doesn’t have to “reify” anything to acknowledge that a flock of starlings, say, doesn’t have a “blood pressure,” while each of individuals making up the flock does; and that the individuals don’t have a “median” blood pressure, though the flock does. [read post]
